Rule 410. Pleas, Plea Discussions, and Related Statements
(a) Prohibited
Uses. In a civil or criminal case, evidence of the following is not admissible
against the defendant who made the plea or participated in the plea
discussions:
(1) a guilty plea that
was later withdrawn;
(2) a nolo contendere plea;
(3) a statement made
during a proceeding on either of those pleas under Federal Rule of Criminal
Procedure 11 or a comparable state procedure; or
(4) a statement made
during plea discussions with an attorney for the prosecuting authority if the
discussions did not result in a guilty plea or they resulted in a
later-withdrawn guilty plea.
(b) Exceptions. The court may admit a statement
described in Rule 410(a)(3) or (4):
(1) in any proceeding in
which another statement made during the same plea or plea discussions has been
introduced, if in fairness the statements ought to be considered together; or
(2) in a criminal proceeding for perjury
or false statement, if the defendant made the statement under oath, on the
record, and with counsel present.
2011
Advisory Committee Note. – The
language of this rule has been amended as part of the restyling of the Evidence
Rules to make them more easily understood and to make style and terminology
consistent throughout the rules. These changes are intended to be stylistic
only. There is no intent to change any result in any ruling on evidence
admissibility. This rule is the federal rule, verbatim.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE NOTE
This rule is the federal rule,
verbatim. There was no comparable rule in the Utah Rules of Evidence (1971).
However, withdrawn pleas of guilty have been ruled inadmissible by the Utah
Supreme Court. State v. Jensen, 74 Utah 299, 279 P. 506 (1929).
Rule 410(4) does not cover plea
negotiations with public officials other than prosecuting attorneys. There are
still constitutional limitations on the use of statements obtained from
suspects. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d
694 (1966); Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201,
84 S. Ct. 1199, 12 L. Ed. 2d 246 (1964).